![]() |
Re: L8h43
Quote:
|
Re: L8h43
Quote:
|
Re: L8h43
All the fake frs on g17 here created by okt and his cronies kakis using multiple accounts to mislead people into taking her..when in fact g17 is a dead fish 1)she choose to shower alone..spending more than 15 minutes alone shower clearly time wasting tactic 2) she demands tips if you want to do bbbj or kissing or frenching..She Specifically asked me to pay her the tips first not after the session 3) the way she demanded the tips like the queen or president style.she raised her right hand and pointed at my face:mad: she kept saying give me money:eek::mad:4)after she shower finish she choose to look at her phone first instead of drying herself with tower..G17 is the most unprofessional wl and money faced and demanding personality...:mad:
|
Re: L8h43
based on the forum review and previous patterns, bowiek's review appears to have inconsistencies that raise suspicion about its credibility. here are key observations:
1. contradictory statements: in one post, bowiek claims that g17 was "not really ang pai quality" and that "many bros hyped her up." however, he contradicts himself by stating that she was actively pestering for tips. if she was truly lackluster, why would she be hyped up by many others? 2. repeated negative focus on tips: bowiek repeatedly emphasizes that g17 asks for tips, portraying it as a major flaw. this could be an attempt to paint a negative image rather than providing an objective review. 3. different descriptions of the same experience: in one comment, he describes her as "average only," and in another, he goes into extensive detail about the session, focusing on negatives. the tone suggests an exaggeration of flaws. 4. similarity to previous fake reviews: the phrasing and complaints are strikingly similar to previous negative reviews found in these forums, where certain users may have an agenda against specific working ladies. 5. possible influence from external factors: there is a chance that this review was influenced by personal bias, a failed expectation, or even competition among working ladies, where certain individuals attempt to damage the reputation of others. conclusion: the way his review is framed—with exaggerated negatives, contradicting points, and an overemphasis on tipping—suggests that it may be misleading or exaggerated rather than a genuine critique. further verification from multiple independent sources would be needed to confirm its authenticity. |
Re: L8h43
Quote:
|
Re: L8h43
bowiek's latest comments continue to follow the same pattern of exaggerated negativity, inconsistencies, and questionable motives. here’s a breakdown of key observations:
1. exaggerated claims & repetitive criticism: bowiek repeatedly accuses g17 of being a "dead fish" and overly demanding when it comes to tips. the emphasis on time-wasting tactics, showering alone, and using her phone instead of drying herself is overly detailed, making it seem like an effort to damage her reputation rather than just sharing a bad experience. 2. contradictions & bias: earlier, he mentioned g17 pestering for tips but also claimed many bros hyped her up. if she were truly so bad, why would she be hyped? now, he adds that she pestered him to extend the session, yet he already described her as unprofessional and unpleasant. why would he think she wanted to extend a bad session? this contradiction suggests exaggeration. 3. similarity to past fake reviews: his review structure and phrasing match previous negative reviews on working ladies, where specific individuals continuously target certain girls. the heavy focus on "fake frs" created by okt and cronies is a common tactic used to discredit positive reviews. 4. emotional manipulation in writing style: bowiek attempts to appeal to emotions by claiming g17 “manipulates soft-hearted customers.” this kind of generalization is a tactic used to influence readers rather than provide an unbiased experience. conclusion: bowiek's review appears to be another exaggerated attempt to discredit g17. his contradictions, repeated emphasis on tipping, and similarity to previous suspected fake reviews suggest that his account is likely biased or agenda-driven rather than a fair assessment. verification from independent sources would be necessary to determine the true nature of g17’s service. |
Re: L8h43
The truth hurts...you are the okt defending your g17..I just post my honest and truthful review on g17..for so long you and your cronies post fake reviews to lure customers to g17 den..and she milked them dry...the truth hurts because someone finally expose your g17 scam ...the good reviews on g17 have been exaggerated by your kakis to bring in victims and unsuspecting customers or newbies to the slaughterhouse..in fact many of your fake frs here on g17 exaggerated the so call good services she claim she can do..when in fact she don't bbbj..she don't french kiss .she prefers to shower alone rather than with customers..my review is honest and truthful yet you are worried that the g17 scam kena exposed..The reason why you fear the truth ..people will come to know g17 is a dead fish .a con artist...she doesn't even want to shower together with customers :eek:
|
Re: L8h43
Quote:
|
Re: L8h43
If she is not your cup of tea, just move on. Making a fuss is just show your words are fake or you just want to destroy someone's rice bowel.
Ego too big har? |
Re: L8h43
Quote:
|
Re: L8h43
bowiek's reply continues his trend of repetitive and exaggerated claims, making his review appear more like an agenda-driven smear rather than an objective assessment. here’s a review of his response:
1. repetitive narrative & over-exaggeration: he repeatedly emphasizes "g17 time wasting tactics" and "shower alone 15 minutes" as if it’s the ultimate crime. if this was truly an issue, it would be a common complaint, but he keeps forcefully pushing the same point. using phrases like "big red flag" and "big landmine" makes it seem like he’s deliberately trying to discourage others rather than providing a fair review. 2. accusations without proof: he insists that "good reviews on g17 are exaggerated by okt kakis," claiming they are posted to lure unsuspecting customers. this is a strong accusation without evidence. just because others had a better experience doesn’t mean they are lying or part of some conspiracy. mentions of "more people have exposed the g17 scam" lack references or specific details, making it seem like he’s trying to validate his claims by pretending there's a consensus. 3. emotional manipulation & personal bias: words like "victims," "scam," and "slaughterhouse" aim to stir fear rather than provide an honest review. he paints himself as a "whistleblower" exposing the so-called truth, but his repeated emotional phrasing makes it look like personal frustration rather than factual reporting. 4. lack of balance in review: nowhere in his review does he acknowledge any neutral or positive aspects—just pure negativity. even bad experiences usually have some redeeming factors, but his post is one-sided. this suggests an agenda rather than an unbiased review. conclusion: bowiek's reply follows the same pattern of exaggeration, emotional manipulation, and pushing a narrative rather than giving a fair review. his claim that g17 is a "scam" sounds more like a personal vendetta rather than a neutral experience. his repetitive focus on the same issues, lack of supporting evidence, and accusations against others suggest an attempt to discredit rather than inform. |
Re: L8h43
Quote:
|
Re: L8h43
Hello you okt runner..when I post honest fr on g17 you don't have to defend her..I booked her one session .I experienced the worst bonk of my life..why you keep defending g17? Get a life ..you are the husband or boyfriend of g17 is it? Go get a life bro
|
Re: L8h43
What's with the negative reviews of G17?
Whatever the reason for that, it seemed rather off from what I had experienced with her - 3 times so far. No, she didn't ask me for tip. No, she didn't shower too long, although she did shower alone after our mutual shower. But not the ridiculous 15 min claim! Yes, first time with her I did not managed to cum but that's because I identified my problem as having a low libido from porn, and she did her best - french kissing, BBBJ. Subsequent time I return, she didn't remember me but her service great like before and with my libido recovered I managed to orgasm from a fuckjob. Third time, service still great even though this time she remembered me. Maybe the complainer remembered the wrong number or house? And also side note, someone else said G8 is leaving on 25 March 2025? can anyone else confirm G8 is leaving earlier than her 4th April 2025, or that poster is talking nonsense as usual? |
Re: L8h43
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 11:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copywrong © Samuel Leong 2006 ~ 2025