Oic...just tat yr recent posts in this thread hv made me v curious bro....
Wif due respect, think u may wish to take heed of the
Protection From Harassment Act 2014 perhaps...
Btw care to share yr pov on my earlier rhetorical Q (repaste below)?....no obligations though
Quote:
Originally Posted by omnia
Actually I had no wish to get involved in this latest argument abv...but since my nick was mentioned...I shall take the liberty to add my pov, if I may...
To me FRs sld be objective and unbiased as best/practically as possible to hv any real value...n to facilitate this criteria...the FR writer's identity has to be kept strictly confidential/kept sceret fm the GL mms that he is writing about at all times....inclusive of keeping secret the fact that he writes FRs in SBF...
The rationale is obvious...if the GL mms know who the FR writer is, then they may try to influence him or alternatively the FR writer may try to influence the GL mms...its all about the benefits game...which wld consequently tarnish/corrupt the credibility/integrity of the FR or at the very least make the FR questionable due to conflict of issue. ..
So do the GL mms know the FR writers SBF nicks i.e. link that particular customer to that particular SBF nick and/or knows that particular customer writes FRs in SBF?...that to me is the critical question ... |
Quote:
Originally Posted by max_priest
Bro, perhaps I did not make it clear ... I have not tried An Ni before and also Jia Mei @ 2047, so I am not in the position to assist and to relate to ... Moreover, there were plenty of you guys jumped in to speak in defense of her ... If I could still remember, I did mention something in defense of Jia Mei but in general and in a subtle fashion ... It is the same for you that you were absolutely silent when Jia Mei or Fei Fei was being accused but you were quick to jump in to defense An Ni ... In fact I am curious as well ... None came forward to defense Fei Fei except Korea & KCY69. I hope you get what I am trying to clarify here ...
Cheerz!
|