It looks like I am not the only one who is skeptical of Knackers story about Rachael.
Sayhello expressed his doubt,
"I agree all interesting and all not as it seems. Some guys just dont play straight down the line."
Now Snapperhead has provided some disturbing evidence to throw even more doubt:-
"I also know that Rachel has a new phone this year, and didn't even know her own number until she called my number from her new phone in the first booking this year, and we ascertained hat her number was from that. She also said she didn't keep any of her customers numbers from last year, including mine, as she wasn't even 100% sure she was even coming back until a month or so before she did in late March. She doesn't seem like the type to keep a database of numbers either.
So I find your story interesting, and I also doubt it's authenticity to be quite honest."
I look forward to Knackers response with interest.
I repeat what I said in my first post on this topic...."Knackers, you have certainly made useful contributions to this forum in the past six weeks, but some things just don't add up."
I have no idea why Knackers would want to be hiding the real story of his past punting exploits in Melbourne, but the more he tries to "explain" his story, the more he casts doubt on its authenticity and on his personal credibility.
Perhaps he might also explain why he commented on the legendary status of Yoyo and Yumi? The comment certainly sounded like he had also booked them on lots of occasions. No doubt he will try to tell us that he has only read about them on the forums
