Originally Posted by accurate FR
thks to those who up me, and also no pt angry with those who zap me.
just like ppl who vote for opposition, at risk of their benefits taken away from their constituencies, they still continue do what they feel is right.
my pt is still same, correct inaccuate fr from those ppl so that they won't waste $ or left in a spot like where feel to reject but embarrassed to do so.
I don't think they are really so poor at judging looks, but ... how do you feel if some guys out there making $ from girls (this is true, u tried asked the okts), and also from our expense, as we wasted our $ due their misleading FRs? FR on svc so far I saw its still accurate, but so far FRs on looks correct ones are only bingbing, violet (both 1809), jenny (2831A), sisi (1612), dingding (16 06A ), zhongqin(retired) etc. not all very chio, but when at least when its average, someone will give like 7/10
misleading ones - qiqi (2831A), lingling (1612), xiao wei (forgotten), mei mei (1654A), nana (16 06A ), happy (forgotten) etc .
syt don't mean chio, so can't compare in the same way as the previous 2 lists. but at least must really have syt looks. nana and happy, whom too highly rated, 9/10? imagine I can reject straight away u can imagine how ridiculous are those '9' ratings, eg for the latter, I asked the okt who happy, he pointed at one which I already saw earlier when I went in the shop, but not impressed, so obviously when I knew she's the one, I immediately walk out
|