Just to clarify my previous post, receiving BBBJ and painting are considered by HIV experts to be theoretical risks only, which means that if the person sucking you has a mouth full of blood then there is a chance you may contract HIV. Likewise, unless a woman has blood flowing from her pussy AND you have badly bleeding gums, there is no chance of contracting HIV from painting. That is why these activities are considered extremely low risk, which means they are a theoretical risk only, which is really a way of saying they are effectively no risk.
Many government health agencies will neglect to differentiate between extremely low risk, low risk, some risk, and high risk. The policymakers of these institutions are being less than honest. They are trying to scare people into practicing safe sex. Unfortunately many doctors who have not thoroughly researched the truth of HIV transmission are misinformed. They themselves believe much of the misinformation that is out there. I have done a lot of research into HIV transmission and have talked to doctors who are considered experts in the field. The truth is that HIV is spread primarily through unprotected anal intercourse and intravenous drug use. It is sometimes spread through penis to vagina intercourse (mostly from man to woman), but much less often than you would think. All forms of oral sex are theoretical risks only. Even giving BBBJ and swallowing sperm are theoretical risks only. Receiving BBBJ and eating pussy are not risks.
Do some research. There are HIV forums on the internet with good information. One of theme is here:
http://forums.poz.com/index.php?board=1.0